RFR: JDK-8183964: Bad lexing of javadoc comments (change in parsing/rendering of backslashes in javadoc)
Jonathan Gibbons
jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com
Tue Jan 2 23:00:55 UTC 2018
Thanks for checking this out.
I agree it seems a reasonable candidate to backport, but I'd have to
check the latest policies for backporting issues.
-- Jon
On 1/2/18 2:55 PM, Liam Miller-Cushon wrote:
> Looks good to me too, for what that's worth.
>
> Is this a good candidate for backporting to 9u?
>
> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 5:02 PM, Vicente Romero
> <vicente.romero at oracle.com <mailto:vicente.romero at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
> looks good,
> Vicente
>
>
> On 01/02/2018 04:49 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>
> Please review this simple fix in the tokenizer for reading
> javadoc comments.
> The fix is just to add a missing 'break' statement.
>
> JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8183964
> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8183964>
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jjg/8183961/webrev.00
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ejjg/8183961/webrev.00>
>
> -- Jon
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/compiler-dev/attachments/20180102/9741cca3/attachment.html>
More information about the compiler-dev
mailing list