RFR 8194268: Incorrect parameter names for synthetic methods

[Liam Miller-Cushon]

Thanks! The changeset is attached.

On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 10:34 AM, Jan Lahoda <jan.lahoda at oracle.com> wrote:

> Sorry for delay. Seems OK to me, I'll run tests and push early next week.
>
> Thanks,
>      Jan
>
> On 25.1.2018 19:27, Liam Miller-Cushon wrote:
>
>> Bump.
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Liam Miller-Cushon <cushon at google.com
>> <mailto:cushon at google.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hello,
>>
>>     This fixes a mistake in
>>     http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/89f6aa26fd6c
>>     <http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/89f6aa26fd6c>
>>     that caused incorrect parameter names to be generated for synthetic
>>     methods.
>>     As I mentioned in the bug I don't think it's a regression, but it
>>     still seems
>>     worth cleaning up.
>>
>>     bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8194268
>>     <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8194268>
>>     webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cushon/8194268/webrev.00/
>>     <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cushon/8194268/webrev.00/>
>>
>>     Thanks,
>>     Liam
>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/compiler-dev/attachments/20180126/83928345/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 8194268.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 4412 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/compiler-dev/attachments/20180126/83928345/8194268.patch>