JDK 12 RFR of JDK-8213444: Missing emphasis for term being defined

[joe darcy]

Hello,

Please review the small change to address

     JDK-8213444: Missing emphasis for term being defined
     http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8213444.0/

Patch below.

The emphasis markup is added to the "present" term in symmetry with the 
other terms being defined. Additionally, the formatting of some text in 
a {@code } structure is improved.

The analogous list of definitions in javax.lang.model.AnnotatedConstruct 
already use emphasis for all the defined terms.

Thanks,

-Joe

--- 
old/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/AnnotatedElement.java 
2018-11-06 21:55:58.195000000 -0800
+++ 
new/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/AnnotatedElement.java 
2018-11-06 21:55:58.027000000 -0800
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
   * exactly one annotation whose value element contains <i>A</i> and whose
   * type is the containing annotation type of <i>A</i> 's type.
   *
- * <li>An annotation <i>A</i> is present on an element <i>E</i> if either:
+ * <li>An annotation <i>A</i> is <em>present</em> on an element 
<i>E</i> if either:
   *
   * <ul>
   *
@@ -145,8 +145,8 @@
   * </tbody>
   * </table>
   *
- * <p>For an invocation of {@code get[Declared]AnnotationsByType( Class <
- * T >)}, the order of annotations which are directly or indirectly
+ * <p>For an invocation of {@code get[Declared]AnnotationsByType(Class 
<T>)},
+ * the order of annotations which are directly or indirectly
   * present on an element <i>E</i> is computed as if indirectly present
   * annotations on <i>E</i> are directly present on <i>E</i> in place
   * of their container annotation, in the order in which they appear in