Switch statement in source results in type$1.class being generated?

[Maurizio Cimadamore]

On 12/07/2019 18:52, Remi Forax wrote:
> why not using ASM [1] instead of rolling your own code ?

This is also a fine alternative.

Another alternative would be to try to load the class with Class.forName 
and check the flags there.

Maurizio