RFR: JEP 359-Records: javadoc code

Maurizio Cimadamore maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com
Fri Oct 18 12:28:45 UTC 2019

I went through the javadoc changes and, although I'm no javadoc expert, 
they seem clean enough, to the point that I could follow the logic quite 

One high-level gripe which is pointing at a failure of the j.l.model API 
is the lack of a way to get to the canonical constructor directly; we 
have this issue both in core reflection and source reflection, and I 
think we should address that, as both serialization and javadoc has to 
DYI around that.


On 17/10/2019 20:45, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> cc: javadoc-dev at openjdk.java.net
> --Jon
> On 10/17/2019 12:43 PM, Vicente Romero wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Please review the javadoc code for JEP 359 (Records), this webrev 
>> contains only the javadoc code as we have decided to split the new 
>> code in clusters to make the review process easier.
>> Thanks in advance for the feedback,
>> Vicente
>> PS, Jon is the author of this code please keep him in the loop
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vromero/records.review/javadoc/webrev.00/

More information about the compiler-dev mailing list