RFR: 8261006: 'super' qualified method references cannot occur in a static context [v7]
Maurizio Cimadamore
mcimadamore at openjdk.java.net
Thu Dec 2 12:00:41 UTC 2021
On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 03:20:48 GMT, Vicente Romero <vromero at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Please review this PR, currently javac is accepting code like:
>>
>>
>> import java.util.function.Supplier;
>>
>> public class MethodReferenceInConstructorInvocation {
>> interface Bar {
>> default String getString() { return ""; }
>> }
>>
>> static class Foo implements Bar {
>> public Foo() { this(Bar.super::getString); }
>> public Foo(Supplier<String> sString) {}
>> }
>> }
>>
>>
>> but the spec states in `15.13 Method Reference Expressions`:
>>
>> If a method reference expression has the form super :: [TypeArguments] Identifier
>> or TypeName . super :: [TypeArguments] Identifier, it is a compile-time error if
>> the expression occurs in a static context (§8.1.3).
>>
>> and a constructor invocation is a static context. So method references of this form, qualified by `super`, should be rejected by the compiler if they appear in a static context.
>>
>> TIA
>
> Vicente Romero has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains seven additional commits since the last revision:
>
> - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8261006
> - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8261006
> - addressing review comments
> - updating comment
> - addressing review comments
> - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8261006
> - 8261006: fail to parse broken interface::method in lambda
src/jdk.compiler/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/comp/Attr.java line 4342:
> 4340:
> 4341: if (isType(sitesym)) {
> 4342: if (sym.name == names._this || sym.name == names._super) {
I suggest to rewrite this as:
if (sym.name == names._this) {
if (site.tsym == env.enclClass.sym) {
// error
}
} else if (sym.name == names._super) {
if (sitesym.isInterface() || site.tsym == env.enclClass.sym) {
// error
}
}
As the compound expression is giving me headache :-)
Note that I've dropped the `constructorArgs` check, because I think this is set in Attr::visitApply, and can be assumed to be true if `isSelfCall` is set.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4376
More information about the compiler-dev
mailing list