[External] : Re: [Ask for sponsoring] Fix another NPE in jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.jvm.Code.emitop0(Code.java:571)

[Jan Lahoda]

Done. Sorry I missed it.


Jan


On 26. 02. 21 14:07, B. Blaser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems the following fix is still not integrated although the pull
> request has been reviewed and looks ready for integration:
>
> https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1479
>
> Is any sponsor available?
>
> Thanks,
> Bernard
>
> On Wed, 23 Dec 2020 at 20:39, Jonathan Gibbons
> <jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com> wrote:
>> Bernard, Jia,
>>
>> You need an expert in this part of the code to do the review, and the likely
>> experts are on vacation through the end of the year and may not be able
>> to respond before the first week of next year.
>>
>> As a matter of policy, if folk (you+reviewers) think this should go in 16,
>> you need to file the PR against the jdk16 repo. From there, it will
>> eventually
>> and automatically be forward-ported to the main jdk rep.
>>
>> Note there will only be a limited window in the new year to fix bugs in 16.
>> See the schedule for JDK 16 here:
>> https://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk/16/
>>
>> -- Jon
>>
>> On 12/23/20 7:32 AM, B. Blaser wrote:
>>> Hi Jia,
>>>
>>> On Wed, 23 Dec 2020 at 05:49, JiaYanwei <jiaywe at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Great! I think it's the best solution and can also be directly backported to 16, 11 & 8.
>>>>
>>>> Should I close (i.e. stop/cancel) the Github PR, or may I commit this code with you(B. Blaser) as the author - just like what Jan Lahoda did in Github PR 1221?
>>> Thanks for your feedback, I filed
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8258897 and assigned it to
>>> Jan (I hope he won't mind). So, I'll let him or maybe Jon advise on
>>> what to do with the pull request.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Bernard