java 17: anonymous classes with diamonds
Anna Kozlova
anna.kozlova at jetbrains.com
Mon Jan 18 13:56:31 UTC 2021
Thanks!
Not sure if it's exactly the same issue, could you please check as well? At
least the error message is not very helpful: "cannot find symbol
symbol: class <captured wildcard>
location: class foo.Boo<T>" (no line number)
```
import java.util.List;
import java.util.function.Predicate;
public class Boo<T> {
public Boo(List<? extends T> l) {
}
void m(List<? extends String> list){
Boo<String> boo3 = new Boo<>(findAll(list, s -> s.length() > 0)){};
}
static <T> List<T> findAll(List<? extends T> collection,
Predicate<? super T> condition) {
return null;
}
}
```
If I remove anonymous class braces, the code starts to compile. Checked
with with java 11 & java 17
Thanks,
Anna
P.S. I've migrated IntelliJ sources to java 11 diamonds, thus the issues.
This one is the last issue I could reproduce with java 17. A lot of issues
have been fixed since java 11!
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 11:18 AM Srikanth <srikanth.adayapalam at oracle.com>
wrote:
> Thanks for the problem report Anna.
>
> It does look suspect and I have raised JDK-8259910 to follow up.
>
> This problem dates back to jdk9 and is reproducible in all the major
> releases from then on.
>
> Srikanth
>
> On 18/01/21 3:08 pm, Anna Kozlova wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> The following code doesn't compile with java 17 eap (java: foo.Boo.Nested
> is abstract; cannot be instantiated)
> ```
> public class Boo {
>
> static abstract class Nested<T> {
> protected Nested(Class<T> aAcceptedClass) { }
>
> }
> static class Outer<T> {
> protected Outer(final Nested<T> condition) { }
> }
>
> static final Outer<Boo> PATTERN = new Outer<>(new Nested<>(Boo.class) {}) {};
> }
>
> ```
> though the anonymous class is used.
>
> At the same time, if I remove the anonymous class from outer call, like
> `static final Outer<Boo> PATTERN = new Outer<>(new Nested<>(Boo.class)
> {});` the code would compile.
>
> If explicit types instead of diamonds are used, everything compiles fine
> as well.
>
> To me this looks like a bug in the compiler, could someone check this
> please?
>
> Thanks,
> Anna
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/compiler-dev/attachments/20210118/46d0acaf/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the compiler-dev
mailing list