[jdk17] RFR: 8267610: NPE at at jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.jvm.Code.emitop

Jan Lahoda jlahoda at openjdk.java.net
Wed Jun 23 14:44:34 UTC 2021


On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 15:05:40 GMT, Guoxiong Li <gli at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Currently, the class TransPatterns sometimes doesn't transform the `pattern variables` and `pattern symbols` to the normal variables and symbols, especially the places where the pattern variables are used.
> The following phases, such as LambdaToMethod, Lower and Gen, may crash or generate some wrong results.
> 
> The known issues are [JDK-8267610](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8267610) and [JDK-8268748](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8268748).
> 
> **JDK-8267610 is an issue that pattern symbol causes the compiler to crash.**
> 
> During transforming the InstanceOfTree (JCInstanceOf) , the `BindingSymbol`  instead of the `VarSymbol` is used to make the new `JCIdent` and `JCBinary` trees. At the phase LambdaToMethod, the compiler can't capture this variable so that the lambda method has uncorrect parameters. So at the phase Gen, the compiler crashes because of NPE.
> 
> **JDK-8268748 is an issue that pattern symbol causes that the compiler generates wrong bytecodes.**
> 
> When transforming the BindingPatternTree (JCBindingPattern), the `BindingSymbol` is also handled uncorrectly and used to make the new `JCIdent` and `JCAssign` trees. At the phase Gen, the compiler find the wrong variables, so that the wrong bytecodes are generated.
> 
> These two issues are similar and influence each other. So I solve them at one patch.
> The lines 208-212 are to solve JDK-8267610 with the test `LambdaCannotCapturePatternVariables`. 
> The lines 233-239 are to solve JDK-8268748 with the test `NestedPatternVariablesBytecode`.
> 
> If lines 208-212 are not included, the test  `NestedPatternVariablesBytecode` can't pass. 
> If lines 233-239 are not included, the test `LambdaCannotCapturePatternVariables` can't pass. 
> So I put them together.
> 
> Thanks for taking the time to review.
> 
> Best Regards,
> -- Guoxiong.

Thanks for looking into this and sorry for trouble. Looking at the implementation, would it make sense to set the currentValue only after the expression is translated? E.g. something like:

diff --git a/src/jdk.compiler/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/comp/TransPatterns.java b/src/jdk.compiler/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/comp/TransPatterns.java
index 4c077968ff5..c57294bf4ab 100644
--- a/src/jdk.compiler/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/comp/TransPatterns.java
+++ b/src/jdk.compiler/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/comp/TransPatterns.java
@@ -189,12 +189,14 @@ public class TransPatterns extends TreeTranslator {
             //=>
             //(let T' N$temp = E; N$temp instanceof typeof($pattern) && <desugared $pattern>)
             //note the pattern desugaring performs binding variable assignments
-            Symbol exprSym = TreeInfo.symbol(tree.expr);
             Type tempType = tree.expr.type.hasTag(BOT) ?
                     syms.objectType
                     : tree.expr.type;
             VarSymbol prevCurrentValue = currentValue;
             try {
+                JCExpression translatedExpr = translate(tree.expr);
+                Symbol exprSym = TreeInfo.symbol(translatedExpr);
+
                 if (exprSym != null &&
                     exprSym.kind == Kind.VAR &&
                     exprSym.owner.kind.matches(Kinds.KindSelector.VAL_MTH)) {
@@ -206,7 +208,6 @@ public class TransPatterns extends TreeTranslator {
                             currentMethodSym);
                 }
 
-                JCExpression translatedExpr = translate(tree.expr);
                 Type principalType = principalType((JCPattern) tree.pattern);
                 result = makeBinary(Tag.AND,
                                     makeTypeTest(make.Ident(currentValue), make.Type(principalType)),


I think the `currentValue` is needed only when the pattern is being processed, not when the expression is being processed, unless I am mistaken.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17/pull/59


More information about the compiler-dev mailing list