RFR: 8297118: Change IncompatibleClassChangeError to MatchException for exhaustive switch statements and switch expressions
Vicente Romero
vromero at openjdk.org
Thu Nov 17 15:41:23 UTC 2022
On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 13:40:46 GMT, Jan Lahoda <jlahoda at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> src/jdk.compiler/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/comp/Lower.java line 131:
>>
>>> 129: options.getBoolean("optimizeOuterThis", false);
>>> 130: disableProtectedAccessors = options.isSet("disableProtectedAccessors");
>>> 131: Source source = Source.instance(context);
>>
>> Does this merit addition of a feature-enum constant in the usual way?
>
> I was thinking of this, but opted to reuse the existing feature constant, as this is not a separate user-selectable feature, but rather part of the patterns in switch feature. Also, each feature enum constant must a diagnostic set, and as it would never be part of any diagnostic, it would be impossible to test.
>
> It is possible to have a separate constant if desired, though.
I'm OK with the current approach
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11189
More information about the compiler-dev
mailing list