RFR: JDK-8200337: Generalize see and link tags for user-defined anchors [v5]
Hannes Wallnöfer
hannesw at openjdk.org
Mon Oct 17 15:39:07 UTC 2022
On Mon, 17 Oct 2022 15:03:12 GMT, Hannes Wallnöfer <hannesw at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Please review a a new feature to allow `@link`, `@linkplain` and `@see` tags to link to arbitrary URI fragments in the generated documentation (including in auxiliary `doc-files` documentation).
>>
>> The changes in module `jdk.compiler` are mostly cleanup changes retained from earlier versions of the patch. The current proposed version uses a very simple change in `ReferenceParser` to avoid parsing the member name section of the reference when a non-member fragment is encountered.
>>
>> The implementation introduces a new form of reference with a double hash mark (`##`) separator. This is a change from the previous implementation which also auto-recognized URI fragments and documentation paths by looking for `-` characters which are not allowed in member names. This feature was removed upon further consideration because it makes the feature more complex and less recognizable.
>>
>> Links to auxiliary documentation files follow the same rules. They are recognized by looking for `/` characters in the fragment name. This means that ordinary `id` attribute values must not contain `/`, while auxiliary file paths must contain a `/` character. Both restrictions should be easy to sustain.
>>
>> One thing that is difficult for this feature is to provide a good link label if no label is supplied in the tag. In contrast to program element names a fragment name does usually not make a good human readable name. The solution is to use the fragment name as default label text. I expect that the feature will usually be used with a user provided label.
>
> Hannes Wallnöfer has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Remove remaining references to aux doc link support
The `allowMember` parameter was never used, so this doesn't change existing behaviour. The validity of `@throws` references is checked by doclint, where we have much more context (such as whether a type is throwable). We could enforce restrictions on references at the parser level, but it will affect code down the line such as the doclint `@throws` checks.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10395
More information about the compiler-dev
mailing list