RFR: 8300543 Compiler Implementation for Pattern Matching for switch [v2]
Vicente Romero
vromero at openjdk.org
Wed Apr 19 23:21:49 UTC 2023
On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 09:13:01 GMT, Jan Lahoda <jlahoda at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This is the first draft of a patch for JEP 440 and JEP 441. Changes included:
>>
>> - the pattern matching for switch and record patterns features are made final, together with updates to tests.
>> - parenthesized patterns are removed.
>> - qualified enum constants are supported for case labels.
>>
>> This change herein also includes removal record patterns in for each loop, which may be split into a separate PR in the future.
>
> Jan Lahoda has updated the pull request incrementally with six additional commits since the last revision:
>
> - Fixing infinite loop where a binding pattern is replaced with a binding pattern for the same type.
> - Reflecting review comments.
> - Fixing exhaustiveness for unsealed supertype pattern.
> - No need to enable features after error reported.
> - SwitchBootstraps.typeSwitch should not initialize enum classes.
> - A prototype of avoiding enum initialization.
src/jdk.compiler/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/comp/Attr.java line 201:
> 199: /** Are unconditional patterns in instanceof allowed
> 200: */
> 201: private boolean allowUnconditionalPatternsInstanceOf;
so I guess this field can be made final now
src/jdk.compiler/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/comp/Flow.java line 909:
> 907:
> 908: Set<Symbol> permitted = allPermittedSubTypes(clazz, csym -> {
> 909: Type instantiated = infer.instantiatePatternType(selectorType, csym);
for some cases, when there are no type parameters, this invocation is a no-op, do we really need inference at this point?
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13074#discussion_r1171830887
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13074#discussion_r1171936405
More information about the compiler-dev
mailing list