RFR: JDK-8306860: Avoid unnecessary allocation in List.map() when list is empty
ExE Boss
duke at openjdk.org
Tue Apr 25 15:41:50 UTC 2023
On Mon, 10 Apr 2023 14:40:00 GMT, Christoph Dreis <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been profiling our compilation tasks lately and noticed that `List.map` is under the top consumers.
>
> <img width="1045" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6304496/230922012-d9c8f63f-beba-4e8a-a33c-367fb3cbf147.png">
>
> There are probably more aggressive options to optimize this, but I found that checking for empty lists already reduces the overall allocations by ~500MB for one of our compilation tasks with no measurable regressions (but also no noticeable improvements) in timings.
>
> <img width="943" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6304496/230922383-e0363eca-bc87-4ad2-8465-ca1e801bd164.png">
>
> In case you consider this worthwhile, I'd appreciate a sponsoring of this (including a ticket because I have no rights to create one, review etc.). I've found https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8032359 but this was closed as won't fix.
>
> Let me know what you think.
>
> Cheers,
> Christoph
src/jdk.compiler/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/util/List.java line 423:
> 421: public <Z> List<Z> map(Function<A, Z> mapper) {
> 422: if (isEmpty()) {
> 423: return (List<Z>)this;
Use `List.nil()` instead, in case this list gets mutated later:
Suggestion:
return List.<Z>nil();
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13407#discussion_r1161908793
More information about the compiler-dev
mailing list