RFR: JDK-8310061: Note if implicit annotation processing is being used [v4]

[Joe Darcy]

On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 17:18:30 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons <jjg at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Joe Darcy has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   Expand cases where an annotation processor path is detected.
>
> test/langtools/tools/javac/diags/examples.not-yet.txt line 217:
> 
>> 215: 
>> 216: # this one needs a forged class file to be reproduced
>> 217: compiler.err.annotation.unrecognized.attribute.name
> 
> Is it just me? I cannot see any difference in these lines...  Is there a difference in trailing whitespace?

IIRC, it was an end-of-file difference, but it isn't being reflected in the webrev either.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14499#discussion_r1245553451