RFR: 8332474: Tighten up ToolBox' JavacTask to not silently accept javac crash as a failure [v3]

Vicente Romero vromero at openjdk.org
Thu Jul 11 15:30:57 UTC 2024


On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 10:53:51 GMT, Jan Lahoda <jlahoda at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Tests for javac use several test frameworks, and one of them is the "toolbox", which provides `JavacTask` that allows to conveniently run javac on a given set of sources. The problem with `JavacTask` is that, by default, when a compilation failure is expected, javac crash (exit code 4) is tolerated by the `JavacTask`. And the test must manually select a specific exit code to overwrite this behavior.
>> 
>> This then leads to bugs like https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8335385, which are silently ignored by `JavacTask`.
>> 
>> The proposal herein is to tighten up the `JavacTask`, and effectively disallow exit code 4 for `JavacTask` (but permit any other exit code, as javac is using several exit codes). The base implementation in `AbstractTask` is changed to use a validator for the exit codes, which is then leveraged by `JavacTask`.
>> 
>> This patch depends on PR #19969, as that fixes JDK-8335385, where the javac crash is ignored. It also tweaks module attribution to not leave empty `JCModuleDecl.sym` for duplicate modules, and set it to an erroneous module. The empty (`null`) symbol here crashes javac in the `test/langtools/tools/javac/modules/MultiModuleModeTest.java#testDuplicateModules`, and the test wouldn't pass with this more strict `JavacTask`.
>
> Jan Lahoda has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains ten commits:
> 
>  - Merge branch 'JDK-8332474' of github.com:lahodaj/jdk into JDK-8332474
>  - Fixing typo, as suggested.
>  - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8332474
>  - Fixing expect semantics
>  - Cleanup.
>  - Cleanup.
>  - Merge branch 'JDK-8335385' into JDK-8332474
>  - 8335385: javac crash on unattributed piece of AST
>  - 8332474: Tighten up ToolBox' JavacTask to not silently access javac crash as a failure

lgtm

-------------

Marked as reviewed by vromero (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19972#pullrequestreview-2172297211


More information about the compiler-dev mailing list