RFR: 8334248: Invalid error for early construction local class constructor method reference [v3]
Vicente Romero
vromero at openjdk.org
Mon Jun 17 11:25:18 UTC 2024
On Sat, 15 Jun 2024 15:28:40 GMT, Archie Cobbs <acobbs at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> The new "flexible constructors" JEP 482 specifies that a local class declared in an early construction context does not have an immediate outer instance, i.e., it has the same behavior as an anonymous class would in that situation.
>>
>> However, the compiler still (incorrectly) tries to verify that an outer instance exists in the case of a method reference to the local class' constructor.
>>
>> Example:
>>
>>
>>
>> import java.util.function.Supplier;
>>
>> class EarlyLocalCtorRef {
>>
>> EarlyLocalCtorRef() {
>> class InnerLocal { }
>> this(InnerLocal::new);
>> }
>>
>> EarlyLocalCtorRef(Supplier<Object> s) {
>> }
>> }
>>
>>
>> Expected output: Successful compilation.
>>
>> Actual output:
>>
>>
>> EarlyLocalCtorRef.java:5: error: cannot reference this before supertype constructor has been called
>> this(InnerLocal::new);
>> ^
>>
>>
>> The fix is to not look for an implicit outer instance for classes that don't have one when encountering a constructor method reference.
>>
>> **NOTE:** The test added here will fail until [JDK-8333313](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8333313) is fixed.
>
> Archie Cobbs has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains five additional commits since the last revision:
>
> - Refactor resolveImplicitThis() to respect actual outer instance.
> - Add Maurizio's innermostAccessibleEnclosingClass() and hasOuterInstance().
> - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8334248
> - Future-proof bug fix vs. new & improved semantics of hasOuterInstance().
> - Don't require outer instance for early construction local class method ref.
lgtm
-------------
Marked as reviewed by vromero (Reviewer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19705#pullrequestreview-2122635694
More information about the compiler-dev
mailing list