RFR: 8342806: Desugar capturing lambda in StringNameTable [v2]

Tue Oct 22 11:11:11 UTC 2024

On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 09:54:58 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore <mcimadamore at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Looks good - thanks!

Thanks!

> It is a bit sad that each name has to carry a pointer back to the name table - especially now that with string-based names the table has become a lot less important. Outside the scope of this PR of course, but it feels like this area is in need for some kind of revisit.

Agree, but since we multiple kinds of tables it might be tricky to unravel this. 

(Needs re-approval after fixing nits)

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21631#issuecomment-2428986773