RFR: 8339190: Parameter arrays that are capped during annotation processing report incorrect length [v2]

[Nizar Benalla]

> Can I please get a review for this change.
> Passes tier1, currently running tier 2-3.
> 
> The regression test creates temporary files in `tmpdir` to check that the warning is emitted correctly.
> I've also added the new warning to `example.not-yet.txt` as the example would require a very large file.
> 
> Here is the result of running `javap -c -p -v` on `ClassAnnotationWithLength_65536.class`  and `ClassAnnotationWithLength_65537.class` respectively. Results are the same before/after the change.
> 
> 
> static int x;
>     descriptor: I
>     flags: (0x0008) ACC_STATIC
>     RuntimeVisibleAnnotations:
>       0: #14(#15=s#16,#17=I#18,#19=[J#20])
>         CustomAnno(
>           value="custom"
>           count=42
>           arr=[-1l]
>         )
> 
> 
> 
>   static int x;
>     descriptor: I
>     flags: (0x0008) ACC_STATIC
>     RuntimeVisibleAnnotations:
>       0: #14(#15=s#16,#17=I#18,#19=[J#20,J#20])
>         CustomAnno(
>           value="custom"
>           count=42
>           arr=[-1l,-1l]
>         )
> 
> 
> TIA

Nizar Benalla has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:

  - remove unused import
  - realized I need to change the condition in my for loop

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21663/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21663/files/e44f23e3..80d25a19

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=21663&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=21663&range=00-01

  Stats: 2 lines in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 1 del; 1 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21663.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21663/head:pull/21663

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21663