RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v3]

[Harshitha Onkar]

On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 16:47:31 GMT, Alexey Ivanov <aivanov at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This doubt applies to all the tests which exercise lazy values or similar logic… without and *with* the security manager.
>> 
>> Now, without the security manager, the problematic cases are no longer relevant; the common path *without* the SM remains unchanged and was never an issue.
>> 
>> However, a more thorough analysis is required.
>
> The tests with “Audit Core Reflection” in their summary fall into this category, we may consider removing them.

@prrace Can you please advice on “Audit Core Reflection” category of tests. I'm not 100% sure if these tests need to be deleted or retained (May be some of them are required for code coverage purpose and/or testing code paths that are not covered by existing tests).

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21498#discussion_r1817385564