RFR: 8353840: JNativeScan should not abort for missing classes [v3]
Chen Liang
liach at openjdk.org
Wed Apr 9 15:14:30 UTC 2025
On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 14:25:11 GMT, Danish Nawab <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Changes look good, thanks!
>>
>> Please note that we will have to wait 24 hours before integrating, in order to give other reviews time to look as well.
>
>> Changes look good, thanks!
>>
>> Please note that we will have to wait 24 hours before integrating, in order to give other reviews time to look as well.
>
> Great, thanks for your review!
> I will wait until tomorrow to issue the `/integrate` (as instructed by openjdk[bot]). Since I am not an OpenJDK committer, I will request you to please sponsor it.
Hello @danishnawab, I have updated the issue title to "JNativeScan should not abort for missing classes" to be more accurate for the changes done. Can you update the PR title here too?
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24499#issuecomment-2790067812
More information about the compiler-dev
mailing list