RFR: 8373119: JDK 26 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2]

Chen Liang liach at openjdk.org
Mon Dec 15 19:52:37 UTC 2025


On Mon, 15 Dec 2025 19:37:45 GMT, Weijun Wang <weijun at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> The intent is "{1} may need to be recompiled against the up-to-date {0} class-file dependency".
>> 
>> Also the original English term is not exactly accurate - It should have been "InnerClasses attribute **entry** for {0} in {1} inconsistent with source code". An unfortunate miss there.
>
> So the Chinese translation is still not precise and it should be something like "按照"?

Uhh not quite... I don't know what's the translation term for recompile {1} with the latest {0} in classpath. So compiling {1} using {0} kind of makes sense.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28802#discussion_r2620629526


More information about the compiler-dev mailing list