RFR: 8361445: javac crashes on unresolvable constant in @SuppressWarnings
ExE Boss
duke at openjdk.org
Sun Jul 6 17:29:38 UTC 2025
On Sun, 6 Jul 2025 07:40:47 GMT, Jan Lahoda <jlahoda at openjdk.org> wrote:
> Consider this code:
>
> @SuppressWarnings(CONST)
> public class Ann {
> public static final String CONST = "";
> }
>
>
> javac will crash attempting to compile it:
>
> $ javac -XDdev /tmp/Ann.java
> /tmp/Ann.java:1: error: cannot find symbol
> @SuppressWarnings(CONST)
> ^
> symbol: variable CONST
> 1 error
> An exception has occurred in the compiler (26-internal). Please file a bug against the Java compiler via the Java bug reporting page (https://bugreport.java.com/) after checking the Bug Database (https://bugs.java.com/) for duplicates. Include your program, the following diagnostic, and the parameters passed to the Java compiler in your report. Thank you.
> java.lang.ClassCastException: class com.sun.tools.javac.code.Attribute$Error cannot be cast to class com.sun.tools.javac.code.Attribute$Constant (com.sun.tools.javac.code.Attribute$Error and com.sun.tools.javac.code.Attribute$Constant are in module jdk.compiler of loader 'app')
> at jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.code.Lint.suppressionsFrom(Lint.java:533)
> ...
>
>
> The reason is that the unresolvable constant will be `Attribute.Error`, not `Attribute.Constant`, and there's an unguarded cast. The proposal herein is to improve error recovery by ignoring non-constant annotation attributes in `Lint.suppressionsFrom`. Such erroneous cases should have already been reported as compile-time errors anyway.
src/jdk.compiler/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/code/Lint.java line 538:
> 536: .flatMap(LintCategory::get)
> 537: .filter(lc -> lc.annotationSuppression)
> 538: .ifPresent(result::add);
It might be better to do the following, which also fixes the non‑`String` case:
Suggestion:
if (value instanceof Attribute.Constant c && c.value instanceof String s) {
LintCategory.get(s)
.filter(lc -> lc.annotationSuppression)
.ifPresent(result::add);
}
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26142#discussion_r2188478615
More information about the compiler-dev
mailing list