RFR: 8164714: Constructor.newInstance creates instance of inner class with null outer class [v2]

[Vicente Romero]

On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 15:12:28 GMT, Chen Liang <liach at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> The Java Language Specification anticipates that inner classes always have non-null enclosing instances. It ensures the non-nullness by enforcing null checks at the use sites that provides immediately enclosing instances to inner class constructors, such as for super invocations, or an `outer.new Inner()` invocation.
>> 
>> However, the translations do not require a null check in the actual constructor, when the immediately enclosing instance is received through a mandated parameter and stored into a synthetic field or discarded.  As a result, class file constructs, such as core reflection, method handles, or arbitrary class files can pass in `null` for the immediately enclosing instance, and later execution may fail with NPE by chance if any enclosing instance is used.
>> 
>> This patch proposes to add a null check against the "outer this" in inner class constructors that call a superclass constructor, including when the "outer this" is discarded immediately thereafter (#4966) for consistency. This null check will be emitted regardless of source or target versions. This change is considered an implementation artifact like the synthetic field that captures the enclosing instance; as a result, there is no JLS change.
>> 
>> The reason for this eager NPE decision is that there is no compatibility of such NPE behaviors - any evolution of the inner classes constructed with null enclosing instances may suddenly start using an enclosing instance and fail with NPE. Therefore, there's no compatibility aspect in such out-of-spec usages of passing `null` as immediately enclosing instance, and this null check can be considered such an evolution.
>
> Chen Liang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Fix javap test

test/langtools/tools/javap/AnnoTest.java line 5:

> 3:  * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
> 4:  *
> 5:  * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it

why changing this test?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23875#discussion_r1981705165