RFR: 8343580: Type error with inner classes of generic classes in functions generic by outer [v2]
Vicente Romero
vromero at openjdk.org
Thu May 22 15:10:54 UTC 2025
On Thu, 22 May 2025 09:10:39 GMT, Aggelos Biboudis <abimpoudis at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> javac determines erroneously that `getter` has a raw type (`G.Getter`). The type of `getter` is deduced as the raw type `Getters<T>.Getter` by javac. Thus, the `Object` in the following example. The question is whether it should be treated as raw or not in the scenario where the qualifying type *is* a type parameter, as in `G.Getter`. In this case `Getter` is inherited from the supertype `Getters<T>`:
>>
>>
>> static abstract class Getters<T> {
>> abstract class Getter {
>> abstract T get();
>> }
>> }
>>
>> static class Usage<T, G extends Getters<T>> {
>> public T test(G.Getter getter) {
>> return getter.get(); // incompatible types: Object cannot be converted to T
>> }
>> }
>>
>>
>> It seems that this is a compiler bug. According to 4.8 Raw Types a “rare” type occurs when the inner is a partially raw type but the definition of Getter doesn’t take any type variables, so this is not a case of a "rare" type. `G.Getter` describes a type with a qualifying type being a type parameter which is not raw and moreover there is an instantiation of its bound. Simply not looking into the bounds of `G` seems like a compiler bug.
>
> Aggelos Biboudis has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Address review
lgtm
-------------
Marked as reviewed by vromero (Reviewer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25346#pullrequestreview-2861619723
More information about the compiler-dev
mailing list