RFR: 8374658: Consider use of "included" rather than "enclosed" in jx.a.p.Processor

[Joe Darcy]

On Wed, 7 Jan 2026 03:46:46 GMT, Joe Darcy <darcy at openjdk.org> wrote:

> The use of "enclosed" in javax.annotation.processing.Processor looks to be using a more colloquial definition than the JLS-eque notion of "enclosed" used in parts of the javax.lang.model API.
> 
> Instead, this PR proposes to switch from "enclosed" to "included," a term already used in RoundEnvironment for the concept in question.

Once there is agreement on the details of the wording changes, I'll file the CSR, etc.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29076#issuecomment-3717210819