javac CRASH

Ulf Zibis Ulf.Zibis at gmx.de
Mon Aug 10 23:58:02 UTC 2009


Rémi, thanks.

I just tried it, but got errors:

C:\Projects\OpenJDK7\langtools\make>"C:\Programme\Java\NetBeans 
6.7.1\java2\ant\bin\ant"
Buildfile: build.xml

-def-check:

-check-boot.java.home:

BUILD FAILED
C:\Projects\OpenJDK7\langtools\make\build.xml:370: The following error 
occurred
while executing this line:
C:\Projects\OpenJDK7\langtools\make\build.xml:737: Cannot locate 
bootstrap java:
 please set boot.java.home to its location

Total time: 1 second


-Ulf


Am 04.08.2009 15:17, Rémi Forax schrieb:
> Le 04/08/2009 13:07, Ulf Zibis a écrit :
>> Maurizio,
>>
>> much thanks for the additional info.
>>
>> I like to avoid going back to b63.
>> If the fix will not go into b68, could you please provide a binary 
>> patch for b67 (or b68) (Windows version)?
>> I can wait for release of b68, but not for b69, as I'm on vacation 
>> until Aug. 10.
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> -Ulf
>
> you can do it by yourself,
> clone the langtools repository, it can be built with ant, so just type 
> ant
> in the directory "make", it will create a tools.jar.
> Now remplace the tools.jar of your binary build by this new one.
>
> cheers,
> Rémi
>
>>
>>
>> Am 04.08.2009 12:20, Maurizio Cimadamore schrieb:
>>> Ulf Zibis wrote:
>>>> Maurizio,
>>>>
>>>> much thanks for the fast info.
>>>>
>>>> Will this fix be included in next build b68 ???
>>>> Hopefully !
>>> Not sure if it will make into b68 - but certainly it will go into 
>>> b69 (depends on the integration process). The fix is already 
>>> available in the langtools repository used for development 
>>> (http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/langtools).
>>>
>>> Maurizio
>>>>
>>>> -Ulf
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 04.08.2009 11:08, Maurizio Cimadamore schrieb:
>>>>> Ulf Zibis wrote:
>>>>>> See:
>>>>>> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6868135 --> 
>>>>>> java.lang.NullPointerException from compiler (1.7.0-ea)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Ulf
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Ulf,
>>>>> this is a type annotation (JSR 308) bug that has been recently 
>>>>> fixed - it is a duplicate of 6861837.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Maurizio
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>




More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list