Code review request for 4891262 "API spec, javax/accessibility: few invalid javadoc tags"

[Joseph D. Darcy]

Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> 2009/12/10 Joseph D. Darcy <Joe.Darcy at sun.com>:
>   
>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>     
>>> 2009/12/10 Joe Darcy <Joe.Darcy at sun.com>:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Hello.
>>>>
>>>> While doing a coredocs build, I noticed once again some javadoc warnings
>>>> coming out of the javax.accessibility package and I decided to fix them;
>>>> the
>>>> patch is below and the full webrev is at
>>>>
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/4891262.0/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> Again, good to see these being fixed.  What do you think to the idea
>>> of backporting these fixes to OpenJDK6 for the next release (b19)?
>>> It's not a major issue, but would improve the documentation packages
>>> being installed by GNU/Linux distros.
>>>
>>>       
>> Andrew, if you wish, you have my approval to apply the fix for 4891262 (just
>> pushed into JDK 7 TL) and also
>>
>> 6909070 "Missing package statements in java.text.Bidi @see links"
>>
>> to OpenJDK 6 build 18, the current build.
>>
>> -Joe
>>
>>     
>
> Thanks.  I'll do that once I get the current timezone patch off my
> stack.  I suggest we leave a full blitz of such warnings until b19
> though, otherwise b18 has the potential to go on for ever :)
>   

Build 19 would be fine too, but at least for now there will be at most 
one or two more doc warnings patches from me in the near future :-)

-Joe