hg: jdk7/tl/jdk: 6642323: Speeding up Single Byte Decoders; ...

[Kelly O'Hair]

Be careful about the "2 weeks ago" stuff... That refers to when the
changeset was created, not necessarily when it was 'pushed' into the
repository.

We need a better online way to browse the changesets.
You can try 'hg view' on your own repository, took me a while
to get that to work on my Mac, but it lets you see the changeset graph.

This blog might help:
   http://blogs.sun.com/kto/entry/openjdk_mercurial_and_the_changeset

-kto


Ulf Zibis wrote:
> Hi Brad,
> 
> 
> Am 08.01.2009 04:01, Brad Wetmore schrieb:
>>
>> Ulf,
>>
>> Sorry for the delay, I've been working on other projects, and my 
>> OpenJDK folder is now overflowing.
> 
> No worry about, I became earlier answer from Sherman (Xueming Shen).
> 
>>
>>> So as I understand right, looking for posts like "Added tag jdk7-b40 
>>> for changeset 44be42de6693" doesn't make much sense in my case.
>>
>> I'm not sure I completely understand the question.
>>
>> We're currently using tags to signify each build (jdk7-b42).  If you 
>> look at the MASTER repository:
>>
>>     http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/jdk/shortlog
>>
>> All the changesets that appear after that entry should be in that build.
> 
> 
> Tag jdk7-b41 was added  2008/12/08 in this list, and jdk7-b42 _2 weeks 
> ago_, so according your rule above, changeset b89ba9a6d9a6, which was 
> published 2008/12/10, should be in b41, at least in b42, but it isn't.
> That was the reason for my question.
> 
> 
>>
>> Regarding 6642323, looks like it's now in the MASTER, but there hasn't 
>> been a promotion yet.  I'd guess it'll be b43.
> 
> I guess too, according Sherman's answer,
> 
> Thanks for your time,
> 
> -Ulf
> 
>