Need reviewer for 6902010: (cl) Delay initialization of ClassLoader.parallelLoaders

[Mandy Chung]

Looks good.  I reviewed your latest webrev that incorporated Rémi's 
suggestion.

Mandy

Alan Bateman wrote:
> Valerie,
>
> I'd like to re-visit the initialization of the parallel-capable 
> loaders [1]. Currently the set of parallel-capable loader types is 
> created by ClassLoader's initializer. That works today but is a bit 
> fragile in that any changes or fixes that cause ClassLoader to be 
> initialized earlier in the VM startup could cause problems. For 
> example, if ClassLoader were to be initialized earlier then adding the 
> initial element will cause a weak reference to be created and that 
> will NPE in the Reference's initializer as the main thread isn't in a 
> thread group at that point. All code that executes before the system 
> classes are fully initialized requires great care so for this one, I 
> think the simplest thing would be to delay the initialization unless 
> the first loader is created. Does that seem reasonable? I've put a 
> webrev with the proposed changes here:
>  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alanb/6902010/webrev.00/
> For testing, I've been using the tests in 
> test/java/lang/ClassLoader/deadlock.
>
> Thanks,
> Alan.
>
> [1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/45ff1a9d4edb
>
>