JSR-292: Why not java.lang.dyn?

[Christian Thalinger]

On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 23:43 -0500, Paul Benedict wrote:
> I've always found it a bit perplexing that java.lang was never chosen
> for the parent package of the Dynamic API. Why is that? Dynamic types
> are now "part of the language" as proven by spec itself and exotic
> identifiers. Will this be reconsidered?

[I'm forwarding this question to mlvm-dev.]

I think John Rose or another member of the EG should have an answer to
this.

-- Christian