What methods should go into a java.util.Objects class in JDK 7?
Joe Darcy
Joe.Darcy at Sun.COM
Tue Oct 6 22:50:34 UTC 2009
Joe Darcy wrote:
> Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Joe Darcy wrote:
>>> Stephen Colebourne wrote:
>>>> Joe Darcy wrote:
>>>>> What other utility methods would have broad enough use and
>>>>> applicability to go into a common java.util class?
>>>>
>>>> Joe,
>>>> You've asked for a call for ideas, but not given any indication of
>>>> process. Are you going to evaluate everything that comes in and
>>>> pick the best a la Coin? Or allow anyone to send in patches?
>>>
>>> Those options are not mutually exclusive; patches are welcome
>>> subject to the usual terms and conditions.
>>>
>>>> Who decides what is in and what is out?
>>>
>>> This is a little side project of mine and I wanted to get some
>>> feedback before preparing a formal change for review, possibly
>>> including patches from others.
>>>
>>> -Joe
>>
>> I'm getting caught up after the JVM Languages Summit and will post
>> some java.util.Objects code for review in the near future.
>>
>> -Joe
>
> Below is a patch implementing the methods I think should go into
> java.util.Objects as a first cut:
>
> * null safe two-argument equals method
> * null safe hashCode(Object) returning 0 for null
> * null safe toString(Object), returning "null" for a null argument
> * null tolerating compare method; tests if both arguments are == and
> if not calls compare
>
> The need for the last of these in Objects isn't quite as clear.
>
> Var-arg-ifying some of the existing methods in Arrays,
> (hashCode(Object[]), deepHashCode(Object[]) and toString(Object[])),
> is probably worthwhile but can be done separately.
>
> I wouldn't oppose a toDebugString(Object) method going into the
> platform somewhere, but I don't think it necessarily belongs in Objects.
>
> Further below is the code for an annotation processor which finds
> candidate equals methods to be replaced with Objects.equals. It found
> over half a dozen good candidates in the jdk repository. To run the
> annotation processor, first compile the class and then run it with
> javac similar to this:
>
> javac -proc:only -processor EqualsFinder -processorpath <path to
> processor> sources
>
> -Joe
>
Updated patch of java.util.Objects with some spec clarifications
suggested by Alan Bateman and the use of and reference to
String.valueOf(Object) observed by Jason Mehrens.
-Joe
--- /dev/null 2009-08-12 17:12:33.000000000 -0700
+++ new/src/share/classes/java/util/Objects.java 2009-10-06
15:47:16.000000000 -0700
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
+ * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
+ *
+ * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
+ * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation. Sun designates this
+ * particular file as subject to the "Classpath" exception as provided
+ * by Sun in the LICENSE file that accompanied this code.
+ *
+ * This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
+ * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
+ * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License
+ * version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that
+ * accompanied this code).
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
version
+ * 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
+ * Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
+ *
+ * Please contact Sun Microsystems, Inc., 4150 Network Circle, Santa Clara,
+ * CA 95054 USA or visit www.sun.com if you need additional information or
+ * have any questions.
+ */
+
+package java.util;
+
+/**
+ * This class consists of {@code static} utility methods for operating
+ * on objects.
+ *
+ * @since 1.7
+ */
+public class Objects {
+ private Objects() {
+ throw new AssertionError("No java.util.Objects instances for
you!");
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Returns {@code true} if the arguments are equal to each other
+ * and {@code false} otherwise.
+ * Consequently, if both arguments are {@code null}, {@code true}
+ * is returned and if exactly one argument is {@code null}, {@code
+ * false} is returned. Otherwise, equality is determined by using
+ * the {@link Object#equals equals} method of the first
+ * argument.
+ *
+ * @return {@code true} if the arguments are equal to each other
+ * and {@code false} otherwise
+ * @see Object#equals(Object)
+ */
+ public static boolean equals(Object a, Object b) {
+ return (a == b) || (a != null && a.equals(b));
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Returns the hash code of a non-{@code null} argument and 0 for
+ * a {@code null} argument.
+ *
+ * @return the hash code of a non-{@code null} argument and 0 for
+ * a {@code null} argument
+ * @see Object#hashCode
+ */
+ public static int hashCode(Object o) {
+ return o != null ? o.hashCode() : 0;
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Returns the result of calling {@code toString} for a non-{@code
+ * null} argument and {@code "null"} for a {@code null} argument.
+ *
+ * @return the result of calling {@code toString} for a non-{@code
+ * null} argument and {@code "null"} for a {@code null} argument
+ * @see Object#toString
+ * @see String#valueOf(Object)
+ */
+ public static String toString(Object o) {
+ String.valueOf(o);
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Returns 0 if the arguments are identical and {@code
+ * c.compare(a, b)} otherwise.
+ * Consequently, if both arguments are {@code null} 0
+ * is returned.
+ *
+ * <p>Note that if one of the argument is {@code null}, a {@code
+ * NullPointerException} may or may not be thrown depending on
+ * what ordering policy, if any, the {@link Comparator Comparator}
+ * chooses to have for {@code null} values.
+ *
+ * @return 0 if the arguments are identical and {@code
+ * c.compare(a, b)} otherwise.
+ * @see Comparable
+ * @see Comparator
+ */
+ public static <T> int compare(T a, T b, Comparator<? super T> c) {
+ return (a == b) ? 0 : c.compare(a, b);
+ }
+}
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list