Progress of patches
Ulf Zibis
Ulf.Zibis at gmx.de
Thu Mar 11 18:25:01 UTC 2010
Am 11.03.2010 05:42, schrieb Martin Buchholz:
> I couldn't resist making a similar change to isValidCodePoint.
>
> @@ -2678,7 +2678,8 @@
> * @since 1.5
> */
> public static boolean isValidCodePoint(int codePoint) {
> - return codePoint>= MIN_CODE_POINT&& codePoint<= MAX_CODE_POINT;
> + int plane = codePoint>>> 16;
> + return plane< ((MAX_CODE_POINT + 1)>>> 16);
> }
>
> /**
>
> This is a more important optimization, since isValidCodePoint
> almost always requires two compares, and this reduces it to one.
>
Why isn't this true for isSupplementaryCodePoint() too ?
Particularly there the "cheap" compare against 0 can't be benefited.
> (Still, none of these are really important, and no one will notice)
>
Maybe in String(int[] codePoints, int offset, int count) or in numerous
sun.nio.cs charset coders which use these methods consecutive in loop on
each unicode character.
-Ulf
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list