Sponsor for 6666666: A better implementation of Character.isSupplementaryCodePoint

[Ulf Zibis]

Hi Martin,

is that 6666666 a fake bug id?
I still can't see it in the public bugparade:

    * This bug is not available.

      More information is available at
      -http://developers.sun.com/resources/bugsFAQ.html#s4q2

-Ulf


Am 11.03.2010 20:38, schrieb Martin Buchholz:
> Ulf, your changes would be easier to get in
> if they were organized as mq patch files that
> could be qimported into an existing mq repo.
>
> I've done that below, which includes a subset of
> your own proposed changes:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk7/isSupplementaryCodePoint/
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk7/public-isBMPCodePoint/
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk7/Character-warnings/
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk7/malformed-utf8/
>
> Sherman (or Alan),
>
> please review and/or file bugs for the above changes.
>
> isBMPCodePoint is a spec addition, requiring additional paperwork.
>
> Sherman, you owe me a response to my now-moldy proposed changes to
> the UTF-8 charset.
>
> The only controversial change would be the change in behavior in
> malformed-utf8, which I can take out.
>
> Martin
>
>    
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/attachments/20100312/8433afa3/attachment.html>