String.lastIndexOf confused by unpaired trailing surrogate
Xueming Shen
Xueming.Shen at Sun.COM
Tue Mar 23 20:32:42 UTC 2010
6937112: String.lastIndexOf confused by unpaired trailing surrogate
Kinda guess that it might bring us some performance benefit to separate
the supplementary handling
code out into its own method (to help the not that smart hotspot:-)?),
but doubt it is really something
worth doing. At least you dont have to have the redundant
value/offset=this.value/offset.
Seems like you started to attach the "final" keyword to all
"constants"...guess it's a hint to help smart
vm for further optimization. Is the hotspot doing something special in
simple case like below?
-Sherman
Martin Buchholz wrote:
> For a change, here's an actual plain old "incorrect result" bug fix
> for String.lastIndexOf
>
> Sherman, please file a bug and review.
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk7/lastIndexOf/
>
> Also includes our usual performance-oriented fiddling.
>
> public class LastIndexOf {
> public static void main(String[] args) {
> int ch = 0x10042;
> char[] bug = new char[3];
> Character.toChars(ch, bug, 0);
> bug[2] = bug[0];
> System.out.println(new String(bug).lastIndexOf(ch));
> bug[2] = '!';
> System.out.println(new String(bug).lastIndexOf(ch));
> }
> }
> ==> javac -source 1.6 -Xlint:all LastIndexOf.java
> ==> java -esa -ea LastIndexOf
> -1
> 0
>
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list