jar -i

[Martin Buchholz]

Approved!

Does this mean that the jar index feature may get some much needed
love in the future?

Martin

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:38, Xueming Shen <xueming.shen at oracle.com> wrote:
> Martin,
>
> Another cleanup. The jar manual [1] clearly indicates the options "cuxti"
> are exclusive with each
> other. The check code was missed when the "i" was added in.
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/4690407/webrev
>
> Please help review.
>
> #Issue of "-i0" mentioned in the description (tracked in a separate
> CR#4823701) is no longer reproducible.
>
> Thanks,
> Sherman
>
> [1]http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/tools/solaris/jar.html
>