Code review request for 6992121: StringBuilder.ensureCapacity(int minCap) throws OutOfMemoryError
Mandy Chung
mandy.chung at oracle.com
Tue Oct 19 04:07:52 UTC 2010
On 10/18/10 4:54 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> Hi Mandy,
>
> The functional changes seem ok. However the ArrayList test is not
> right because it checks the size not the capacity. The same with the
> Vector test, though at least with Vector you can check capacity().
>
I missed the Vector.capacity() method. Thanks. I updated the test.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/6992121/webrev.01/
> I find it odd that ArrayList has a very well defined notion of
> capacity yet no method to query that capacity.
>
True. I don't have the history but wonder if this is intentional.
Mandy
> David
>
> Mandy Chung said the following on 10/19/10 08:41:
>> Please review the fix for:
>>
>> 6992121: StringBuilder.ensureCapacity(int minCap) throws
>> OutOfMemoryError with minCap=Integer.MIN_VALUE
>>
>> Webrev at:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/6992121/webrev.00/
>>
>> This is a regression caused by the changes for 6933217 (Huge arrays
>> handled poorly in core libraries). The ensureCapacity() method in
>> the StringBuffer, StringBuilder, ArrayList, and Vector classes are a
>> public API that accepts negative numbers. The following
>> overflow-conscious code:
>>
>> if (minimumCapacity - value.length> 0)
>>
>> considers negative minimumCapacity as overflow case where
>> OutOfMemoryError will be thrown. So the implementation of the public
>> ensureCapacity() methods need to check if the input argument is
>> positive before doing the above overflow-conscious check.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Mandy
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list