Review (Updated) : 4884238 : Constants for Standard Charsets

[Ulf Zibis]

Am 19.04.2011 10:14, schrieb Alan Bateman:
> Given that it now only defines the constants for the standard charsets then I think the new name 
> is better, although with static import then it might not matter too much.
>
> I'm not sure whether we should use this in the zip code as we don't want this to causes the lesser 
> used charsets to be loaded. It might be worth double checking the startup.

+1
So the use cases for those charset constants minimize against zero.

As written before, I more prefer canonical name constants.

-Ulf