Are emails arriving late to core-libs-dev

[Stuart Marks]

Yes, yesterday evening I also received around 60 old emails destined for 
core-libs-dev, plus bunches of emails for other openjdk lists. So it apparently 
affected all the openjdk lists, not just core-libs-dev.

Interestingly, a message I sent early yesterday made it fairly quickly to the 
To-line recipients and into the mail archive, but it didn't go out to the 
mailing list itself until late yesterday during the general unblockage. This 
might be a clue as to the nature of the blockage; not sure.

s'marks

On 4/27/11 6:20 AM, Lance Andersen - Oracle wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Thank you for the confirmation, that it was a general outage and not just me :-)
>
>
> Regards,
> Lance
> On Apr 27, 2011, at 8:44 AM, David Holmes wrote:
>
>> Lance,
>>
>> There's been some kind of blockage in the openjdk mailing system and it finally got released today. As a result people are getting missing emails from as far back as early March, as well as some duplicate emails.
>>
>> David
>>
>> Lance Andersen - Oracle said the following on 04/27/11 22:28:
>>> Hi Remi and team,
>>> I just received this today, notice the date "March 11th, 2011".  I also received a slew of other emails from core-libs-dev that were also sent days ago.
>>> Regards,
>>> Lance
>>> p.s.  Remi,  Thank you for the comments below.  I will look at incorporating some of the changes such as drivers.isEmpty() in a future update to DriverManager.
>>> My Best,
>>> Lance
>>> On Mar 11, 2011, at 4:03 PM, Rémi Forax wrote:
>>>> Hi Lance,
>>>> - logSync is not declared final.
>>>> - the comment "thow a SecurityException" is not that useful
>>>> - in getDrivers(), I think you can use an ArrayList to gather
>>>>    all drivers and use Collections.enumeration() at the end.
>>>> - also instead of
>>>>
>>>>     if (drivers == null || drivers.equals("")) {
>>>>
>>>>     if (drivers == null || drivers.isEmpty()) {
>>>>
>>>>     should be a little more efficient.
>>>>
>>>> That's all :)
>>>>
>>>> Rémi
>>>>
>>>> On 03/11/2011 09:18 PM, Ulf Zibis wrote:
>>>>> Maybe you could update the javadoc style (<code>  ->  @code etc.) and move the constructor to the begining.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Ulf
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 11.03.2011 21:03, schrieb Lance Andersen - Oracle:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have posted the diffs to DriverManager for review at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lancea/7026898/.  This change utilizes CopyOnWriteArrayList instead of the Vectors previously used.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lance
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
>>>>>> Oracle Java Engineering
>>>>>> 1 Network Drive
>>>>>> Burlington, MA 01803
>>>>>> Lance.Andersen at oracle.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
>>> Oracle Java Engineering 1 Network Drive Burlington, MA 01803
>>> Lance.Andersen at oracle.com
>
>
> Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
> Oracle Java Engineering
> 1 Network Drive
> Burlington, MA 01803
> Lance.Andersen at oracle.com
>