Request for review Remove "private" cause in jdk exceptions

Dalibor Topic dalibor.topic at oracle.com
Fri Aug 26 11:05:34 UTC 2011


On 8/26/11 12:59 PM, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote:
> Am 26.08.2011 08:32, schrieb Peter Jones:
>> Public fields like RemoteException.detail, ill-advised as they may have been, cannot be removed (would break binary compatibility).
> Sorry for that. It was more a reflex (remove "evil" public fields) than a real problem with this. Breaking this would breaking binary compatibility but can this be a real show-stopper for not fixing this?

Breaking binary compatibility is bad, bad, really, really bad.

cheers,
dalibor topic
-- 
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Java F/OSS Ambassador
Phone: +494023646738 <tel:+494023646738> | Mobile: +491772664192 <tel:+491772664192>
Oracle Java Platform Group

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Nagelsweg 55 | 20097 Hamburg

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603

Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
Geschäftsführer: Jürgen Kunz, Marcel van de Molen, Alexander van der Ven

Green Oracle <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment



More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list