RFR 7118066: Warnings in java.util.concurrent package

[Doug Lea]

Thanks for all the comments. We changed to having the
annotations on their own lines (even though it furthers
the Java tendency of gratuitously occupying too much vertical
space :-).  Thanks to Chris for explaining why we didn't
incorporate some of the other suggestions.

Also ...

>> - you added:
>> * @param s the stream
>> for readObject, but not for writeObject. Seems unnecessary for either.
>
> Right, this is obviously not public API and does seem unnecessary. This is just
> a minor style/comment nit to be consistent with other j.u.c. classes. But now I
> see there are a few other readObject methods that are not consistent too ( as
> well as some writeObjects ). If it's ok we can catch these at another time?

Yes, one of these days we should uniformly just remove them all.

-Doug