Code Review Request for Bug #4802647
Alan Bateman
Alan.Bateman at oracle.com
Tue Dec 20 09:17:09 UTC 2011
On 20/12/2011 00:12, David Holmes wrote:
> Brandon,
>
> I don't see the purpose of NewAbstractSet. It is identical to
> NewAbstractCollection.
>
> Otherwise my only concern is as you raised previously, updating the
> test to check existing subclasses causes new failures for ArrayList
> and CopyOnWriteArrayList. I'd suggest fixing ArrayList as part of this
> CR and file a new CR for COWAL so that Doug Lea can fix it upstream in
> the jsr166 cvs repository.
Just to add to David's comments, if the change to COWAL/COWAS is
separated into its own bug then it means that MOAT will need to skip the
retainAll/removeAll(null) tests for these collections as we can't have
this test (or any other) failing.
-Alan.
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list