[Fwd: Re: hg: jdk7/tl/langtools: 7010194: several langtools regression failures after JSR 292 changes (b123)]

[Maurizio Cimadamore]

On 05/01/11 11:23, Alan Bateman wrote:
> Hi maurizio,
> In my opinion, XlintWarn should also test invokeGeneric().
> Moreover, it will be better to have one test by invoke*() instead of
> having one
> test for all invoke*()
>
> Rémi
Hi Remi
I agree on your comments; however note that the aim of the XlintWarn 
test is to check that the compiler issues warnings in relation to 
old-style usage of 292 target typing - since the old syntax is going 
away (see related cleanup CR: 6992698). In other words, the aim of this 
changeset is to make tests pass again (with b123) awaiting for a more 
precise cleanup (which is needed since InvokeDynamic and other 292 
features should be removed from the JDK 7 repo).

Maurizio