Potential timeout issues - tests running in the same vm

[Gary Adams]

  On 11/16/11 11:59 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> On Nov 16, 2011, at 8:29 AM, Gary Adams wrote:
>
>> The jtreg tests that use othervm along with a timeout argument should be
>> fairly reliable in getting a consistent result. The tests that did not specify
>> othervm may run into problems, if they are run concurrently with other tests.
>>
>> Here's a quick sampling of the java/util and java/lang tests that might have issues.
>> Would there be any harm in changing these to designate running in othervm mode?
> My general feeling is 'No harm', looking at this list (somewhat short anyway) these tests seem like
> good candidates to be othervm tests anyway. but that's just my opinion.

The list is artificially shortened. I wanted to keep the thread relevant to
the core libs fixes in progress for reliable tests. I also wanted to see if there
was an overlap with already reported intermittent test failures.

> -kto
>
>> find jdk/test/java/{util,lang} -type f |grep -v hg/|xargs grep -n @run |grep timeout |egrep  -v "othervm|shell"
>>
>> jdk/test/java/util/ResourceBundle/Bug4168625Test.java:27:    @run main/timeout=600 Bug4168625Test
>> jdk/test/java/util/concurrent/BlockingQueue/CancelledProducerConsumerLoops.java:38: * @run main/timeout=7000 CancelledProducerConsumerLoops
>> jdk/test/java/util/concurrent/BlockingQueue/MultipleProducersSingleConsumerLoops.java:38: * @run main/timeout=3600 MultipleProducersSingleConsumerLoops
>> jdk/test/java/util/concurrent/BlockingQueue/ProducerConsumerLoops.java:38: * @run main/timeout=3600 ProducerConsumerLoops
>> jdk/test/java/util/concurrent/BlockingQueue/SingleProducerMultipleConsumerLoops.java:38: * @run main/timeout=600 SingleProducerMultipleConsumerLoops
>> jdk/test/java/util/concurrent/ConcurrentHashMap/MapCheck.java:38: * @run main/timeout=240 MapCheck
>> jdk/test/java/util/concurrent/ConcurrentHashMap/MapLoops.java:38: * @run main/timeout=1600 MapLoops
>> jdk/test/java/util/concurrent/Exchanger/ExchangeLoops.java:38: * @run main/timeout=720 ExchangeLoops
>> jdk/test/java/util/concurrent/ExecutorCompletionService/ExecutorCompletionServiceLoops.java:38: * @run main/timeout=3600 ExecutorCompletionServiceLoops
>> jdk/test/java/util/concurrent/FutureTask/CancelledFutureLoops.java:38: * @run main/timeout=2000 CancelledFutureLoops
>> jdk/test/java/util/concurrent/locks/ReentrantLock/CancelledLockLoops.java:38: * @run main/timeout=2800 CancelledLockLoops
>> jdk/test/java/util/concurrent/locks/ReentrantLock/LockOncePerThreadLoops.java:38: * @run main/timeout=15000 LockOncePerThreadLoops
>> jdk/test/java/util/concurrent/locks/ReentrantLock/SimpleReentrantLockLoops.java:38: * @run main/timeout=4500 SimpleReentrantLockLoops
>> jdk/test/java/util/concurrent/locks/ReentrantReadWriteLock/MapLoops.java:38: * @run main/timeout=4700 MapLoops
>> jdk/test/java/util/logging/LoggingDeadlock.java:32: * @run  main/timeout=15 LoggingDeadlock
>> jdk/test/java/util/logging/LoggingDeadlock2.java:31: * @run  main/timeout=15 LoggingDeadlock2
>> jdk/test/java/util/logging/LoggingDeadlock3.java:30: * @run main/timeout=80 LoggingDeadlock3
>> jdk/test/java/util/logging/LoggingDeadlock4.java:30: * @run main/timeout=15 LoggingDeadlock4
>> jdk/test/java/util/zip/ZipFile/ManyEntries.java:27: * @run main/timeout=600 ManyEntries
>> jdk/test/java/lang/annotation/AnnotationTypeMismatchException/FoundType.java:29: * @run main/timeout=30 FoundType
>> jdk/test/java/lang/management/MemoryMXBean/CollectionUsageThreshold.java:34: * @run main/timeout=300 CollectionUsageThreshold
>>