Reviewer needed: 6282196 There should be Math.mod(number, modulo) methods
Alex Lam S.L.
alexlamsl at gmail.com
Mon Apr 16 21:27:25 UTC 2012
Hi there,
Sorry if this has been asked before, but I am curious as to why the
newer methods in StrictMath (including addExact etc.) are now
delegating to methods in Math.
Looking at the other static methods, they seem to be going in the
opposite direction, i.e. Math methods calling equivalent methods in
StrictMath.
Thanks,
Alex.
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Roger Riggs <Roger.Riggs at oracle.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've corrected a number of issues raised with javadoc in java.lang.Math
> and java.lang.StrictMath. The updated webrev is:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/6282196.2/
>
> Please review.
>
> Thanks, Roger
>
>
>
> On 03/05/2012 08:38 AM, Roger Riggs wrote:
>>
>> CR 6282196 There should be Math.mod(number, modulo) methods
>> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6282196
>>
>> Requests that floor and modulus methods be provided for primitive types.
>> Floor division is pretty straight-forward, rounding toward minus infinity.
>> For modulus of int and long, the sign and range follow the exiting floor
>> method
>> in java.util.Math and satisfy the relation that mod(x, y) = (x -
>> floorDiv(x, y) * y).
>>
>
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list