Code review request for javadoc problem in java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle

[Mike Duigou]

+1

On Jan 9 2012, at 18:17 , Joe Darcy wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> Please review the simple patch below to fix a javadoc problem in java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle which stems from the arguments to the {@link} javadoc tag being reversed.
> 
> Once reviewed, I'll file a bug for this and push the fix.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -Joe
> 
> diff -r 858038d89fd5 src/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/MethodHandle.java
> --- a/src/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/MethodHandle.java    Mon Jan 09 15:54:44 2012 -0800
> +++ b/src/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/MethodHandle.java    Mon Jan 09 18:14:23 2012 -0800
> @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@
>  * generates a single invokevirtual instruction with
>  * the symbolic type descriptor indicated in the following comment.
>  * In these examples, the helper method {@code assertEquals} is assumed to
> - * be a method which calls {@link Objects.equals java.util.Objects#equals}
> + * be a method which calls {@link java.util.Objects#equals(Object,Object) Objects.equals }
>  * on its arguments, and asserts that the result is true.
>  *
>  * <h3>Exceptions</h3>
>