Please review fix for 7146424: Wildcard expansion for single entry classpath
Kumar Srinivasan
kumar.x.srinivasan at oracle.COM
Mon Jul 30 12:32:40 UTC 2012
HI David,
> I can't comment on the details of the actual expansion logic, nor the
> tests.
Akhil and I have gone over this.
>
> Looking at the overall structure I'm still unclear why more of this
> isn't just hidden in win32 only files. Why do the new JLI_* methods
> have to be JLI methods? I would have hoped that everything could be
> hidden/handled inside CreateApplicationArgs/
We need JLI_* methods because all of the launcher's implementation is in
the library libjli.so on Unix
and on windows, jli.dll.
Now, main.c is a common stub which provides the main/Winmain for all the
launchers, meaning java
as well as javac, javap etc. therefore main.c is linked with libjli.so
and all of them call into the JLI_Launch an
entry point which starts the launch, with the argc, argv, Note that
substantial argument processing is performed much before we reach
CreateApplicationArgs
Since this expansion is required before we call into JLI_Launch, we need
to call JLI_CmdToArgs
specifically for Windows, for our parsed arguments, so that we can
substitute argc, argv with our parsed version.
Does that answer your question ? So do you have reservations about
exposing the JLI_* interfaces,
I think it is possible to encapsulate these completely within the jli
library, thus not needing to
export those interfaces, but that will complicate the logic within
JLI_Launch, requiring platform
specific expansions functions. I think what we have now is a lot cleaner.
>
> One specific comment:
>
> share/bin/main.c:
>
> 99 #ifdef _WIN32
> 100 {
> 101 int i = 0;
> 102 if (getenv(JLDEBUG_ENV_ENTRY) != NULL) {
> 103 printf("Windows original main args:\n");
> 104 for (i = 0 ; i < __argc ; i++) {
> 105 printf("wwwd_args[%d] = %s\n", i, __argv[i]);
> 106 }
> 107 }
> 108 }
>
> Does MSC not permit declaration of i inside the for loop? It avoids
> the need for the extra scope.
MSC permits, there are two uses of the for-loop counters, I guess I can
create one variable to handle
both, and eliminate the scopes.
Kumar
>
> David
> -----
>
> On 27/07/2012 10:41 PM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please review the fix
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/7146424/webrev.0/
>>
>> to address:
>> 7146424: Wildcard expansion for single entry classpath
>> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7146424
>> and
>> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7167744
>>
>>
>> Notes:
>> a. cmdtoargs.c will be pushed as a separate changeset using a
>> separate CR
>> and with contributor attribution to akhil.arora at oracle.com
>>
>> b. src/solaris/bin/java_md.c is a redundant file and will be removed,
>> webrev for whatever reason is not reporting it.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Kumar
>>
>>
>>
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list