RFR XS: 7092140 Test: TimedAcquireLeak.java fails on SE-E due to -XX:-UsePerfData

[Chris Hegarty]

I ok with this as is.

I wonder if we should added a note about the divergence, just for future 
maintenance and re-syncs?

-Chris.

On 07/03/2012 06:55, David Holmes wrote:
> webrev:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/7092140/webrev/
>
> inlined:
>
> *** 146,156 ****
> final String classToCheckForLeaks = Job.classToCheckForLeaks();
> final String uniqueID =
> String.valueOf(new Random().nextInt(Integer.MAX_VALUE));
>
> final String[] jobCmd = {
> ! java, "-Xmx8m",
> "-classpath", System.getProperty("test.classes", "."),
> childClassName, uniqueID
> };
> final Process p = new ProcessBuilder(jobCmd).start();
>
> --- 146,156 ----
> final String classToCheckForLeaks = Job.classToCheckForLeaks();
> final String uniqueID =
> String.valueOf(new Random().nextInt(Integer.MAX_VALUE));
>
> final String[] jobCmd = {
> ! java, "-Xmx8m", "-XX:+UsePerfData",
> "-classpath", System.getProperty("test.classes", "."),
> childClassName, uniqueID
> };
> final Process p = new ProcessBuilder(jobCmd).start();
>
> Trivial fix to add -XX:+UsePerfData on the exec of the VM being checked
> for leaks.
>
> Chris: I've discussed this one with Doug and as we're adding a hotspot
> specific flag here we don't plan to sync this up with Doug's cvs. As
> Doug put it:
>
> "I think that source divergence is a small price to pay for getting
> rid of this issue, so feel free. "
>
> Thanks,
> David