RFR: 6244047: impossible to specify directories to logging FileHandler unless they exist
Jim Gish
jim.gish at oracle.com
Tue Nov 13 18:25:27 UTC 2012
On 11/13/2012 07:08 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 12/11/2012 23:22, Jim Gish wrote:
>> Which file(s) are you concerned about truncating/damaging? The code
>> I'm impacting is for creating a new lock file. Where is the
>> potential for truncating/damaging that you both are referring to?
>>
>> Is this sufficient (plus the proper exception handling of course) ?
>>
>> //lockStream = new FileOutputStream(lockFileName);
>> fc = FileChannel.open(new
>> File(lockFileName).toPath(), CREATE_NEW, WRITE);
>> //fc = lockStream.getChannel();
> CREATE rather than CREATE_NEW so that it doesn't fail if the lock file
> already exists. Although it's just a lock file then I think it would
> be impolite to truncate it.
>
> You could use Paths.get(lockFileName)rather than new
> File(lockFileName).toPath() here but either is fine.
>
> -Alan.
I think we want it to fail if the lock file already exists. That's why
I used CREATE_NEW. At least the way the logic is now, is that it
attempts to create a new file and if it fails it tries again until it
can create a new one. It may be the case that the lockFileName is not
in the locks map, and thus we don't own it, but it's possible that
another JVM/app is logging in the same location. It, of course, would be
bad practice, but not disallowed. We shouldn't be grabbing a lock file
that might otherwise be in use.
Jim
--
Jim Gish | Consulting Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.0304
Oracle Java Platform Group | Core Libraries Team
35 Network Drive
Burlington, MA 01803
jim.gish at oracle.com
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list