Review Request: 8001533: Java launcher must launch JavaFX applications

Kumar Srinivasan kumar.x.srinivasan at oracle.com
Tue Nov 20 14:30:19 UTC 2012


On 11/20/2012 2:14 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 20/11/2012 02:43, David DeHaven wrote:
>> :
>> After discussion and debate, we've decided the best course of action 
>> right now is to drop the JavaFX-Application-Class support for this 
>> round and revisit (hopefully quickly) in M6. This should alleviate 
>> any concerns for Profile support. There are other issues that require 
>> work to be done on the FX side before we can proceed beyond this, but 
>> this should provide a good baseline to accommodate those changes when 
>> they're ready.
>>
>> So, without further ado, here's the updated webrev:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ddehaven/8001533/webrev.2/
>>
>> -DrD-
> Thanks for the update, it looks reasonable now.

Thanks everyone, as an FYI, I am splitting the changeset into two 
distinct JBS
issues and changesets,  so that proper credits can be attributed to the
respective authors.

Yes, We will smooth the rough edges in M6 with further hashing and testing.

Kumar

>
> -Alan




More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list