Review Request: 7186817 - Remove Windows 95/98/ME Support

Ulf Zibis Ulf.Zibis at CoSoCo.de
Tue Oct 9 19:31:18 UTC 2012


Hi,

I did not look into the details, but the hint about performance on String.toLower in 
WindowsNTFileSystem catched my attention. Here is a very fast converter, which may be enough for 
calculating the hash:

     // Private ASCII-only optimized version
     public static final String toUpper(final String s) {
         boolean allUpper = true;
         char[] ca = null;
         for (int i=0; i<s.length(); i++) {
             int c = s.charAt(i);
             if (c >= 'a' && c <= 'z') {
                 if (allUpper) {
                     ca = s.toCharArray();
                     allUpper = false;
                 }
                 ca[i] -= '\u0020';
             }
         }
         return allUpper ? s : new String(ca);
     }

It also avoids instantiation of new objects, if there is nothing to change.
Note: the equivalent toLower algorithm statistically would be little slower on latin characters, but 
maybe faster on wide spreaded Unicode characters.

-Ulf


Am 09.10.2012 19:46, schrieb Dan Xu:
> Hi folks,
>
> Please help review the code change for CR7186817 to remove Windows 95/98/ME support. The webrev 
> has been uploaded to http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dxu/7186817/webrev/ 
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Edxu/7186817/webrev/>
>
> The main focus of this clean-up is in IO area. And I also cleaned java/lang/ProcessImpl_md.c and 
> java/util/TimeZone_md.c in this transaction.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Dan
>




More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list